Conditional expressions for planeplotter

#CONDITIONAL EXPRESSIONS FOR PLANEPLOTTER PRO#

Which is also BS, I am able to purchase shoes from Zappos (an Amazon company, BTW), and they arrive THE NEXT DAY. Lastly, they tried to blame the carrier (usually UPS). Once my item ships, it takes easily twice as long as it used to arrive. They kept going back to the 'orders take time to process before shipment', which I had explained over and over again that was not my issue. They tried to gaslight me into believing that I didn't have a problem. The higher-ups did not try to address my issue. This has been the only person at Amazon who has understood my issue, but he was powerless to fix it. I was very honest with him that I had already received 25%, he didn't care. Customer Service refunded 25% of my subscription one time, and then about a week later a sympathetic supervisor/manager reviewed my delivery history and agreed it was sub-par and gave me a 100% refund. I am simply asking for the delivery times to go back to what they were.

My address didn't change in 2019, nothing, but the service got way way worse. Amazon Prime 2-Day Shipping delivered in 2-days almost 100% of the time from 2009-2019. I can only dream of the convenience of 2 day shipping. Trying to get a new battery is an ongoing struggle for me, and has been since I noticed the swelling in September 2020. The third-party knockoffs that are available in NZ are faulty, and broke my logic board.

#CONDITIONAL EXPRESSIONS FOR PLANEPLOTTER PRO#

MacBook Pro A1494 battery for A1398) can't even be shipped at all: OWC and iFixit won't send lithium-ion batteries overseas due to federal regulations.

I could fly to Brisbane and back for cheaper than that! The price to Australia is $1399 + $216 fees. I've basically given up on ever getting those parcels.Р”Р„lso import fees are all over the place: on Amazon, a Sabrent Rocket Q 8TB SSD costs $1399 + $992 fees (USD) to ship to NZ. Similar story with a magnetic iPhone cable from Korea (2016). I'm still waiting for my Christmas 2020 present: 'Oh, I'll just put something else in!' Friends have been even worse: some belt clip cases would only ship to the US, and a friend there still hasn't sent them on (after buying them in 2014).

The long shipping times, combined with moving house periodically to keep a low rent, mean my buying habits usually involve splurging on $$$ of online shopping once a year or two.Р”Р„sking girlfriend/parents to forward parcels from Taiwan/France delays it even more. In Taiwan I could buy locally-produced electronics and had it delivered in less than a week, and I thought myself lucky - but overseas packages got lost twice (maybe 10% of the time) due to not having a Chinese address written on them. In New Zealand it can easily take 2 months for packages to arrive from overseas, if at all. Lower-cost marketplaces can only compete if Amazon is not allowed to blackball sellers from access to the only customer base that matters. But that doesn't happen precisely because Amazon's massive subscribed user base represents so much of the market that no can afford not to sell there, which is seemingly the definition of a monopoly and why legal intervention is called for. Normally, market forces would solve this problem without any need for legal intervention, because some other marketplace like WalMart can just offer lower seller fees and attract all the sellers. But they are raising prices across the board by whatever the delta is between their fees and WalMart's fees, or some other marketplace that charges even less, minus the difference in shipping. The post is still misleading in that it doesn't mean Amazon is raising prices across the board by 30-45%. That seems like legitimately monopolistic behavior and something that is illegal and should be stopped. It's the fact that Amazon is charging anywhere between 30-45% in fees to the sellers, which is much higher than other online marketplaces and obviously less than the 0% they'd charge themselves to sell through their own site (though they'd still need to pay money to operate the site), and then punishing them if they sell somewhere else that has lower fees for a lower price. My first instinct after reading the top paragraphs of Stoller's post was also 'so what, this seems fine,' but if you read to the end and see what the suit is really alleging, it's not just a policy that punished sellers for offering discounts on their products when sold off Amazon. Seems like commenters are misreading the lawsuit here.

Conditional expressions for planeplotter